Your information on this subject does not seem grounded in the real world. People are not showing large external genitalia in women’s saunas. There are not resources to architecturally remodel every business in the world according to some new universal standard of gender modesty that hasn't been agreed on. Existing hotels do not have the ability to construct a third sauna. Telling trans people that they need to live their lives as third-gender people rather than as men or women does not uphold the trans person's dignity. Transgender people have always existed and each person finds a way to manage their own life. You don’t have to explain to trans people how cis people perceive trans bodies because trans people have spent their lives paying attention to that. I recommend that you learn more about transgender people—directly from what they communicate about themselves and not from people of bad faith who make them into targets of thought experiments designed to exclude them.
I would like you to take note of one particular aspect of your behavior here. You began by saying that you should be “allowed to express dissent with prevailing opinions” even if a transgender person might feel “offended and distressed.” Then you went on to recommend how trans women should behave so that they will protect cis women from having negative feelings. “Feelings of fear are often irrational yet nevertheless understandable,” you said, and you said it is a “classically male argument” to say otherwise. Well, trans people also have feelings. Their feelings may be based in trauma or anything else. If I say that you are distressing me and that I don’t want to speak with you anymore, and if you respond by asserting that it’s your right to cause me distress by continuing to speak—well, that, to use your term, is a “classically male” argument and behavior, no? Are you not behaving in the same way that you accuse your imagined “trans” person of behaving: a man explaining to people what gender really is, then entering the women’s room and saying he has the right to be there because no one else’s feelings matter?
My article addresses the question of whose feelings matter.
I don’t think you read my article.
Please go away.