You assume that the correct definition of "anti-transgender" and "transphobic" is to "hate trans people or wish harm on them." You also assume that I'm using these words to imply without evidence that someone is hateful, and that I'm simultaneously — this is a different claim! — calling them a heretic.
This is odd, because in this article, which is a 13-min read (3300 words), I did not use the word "hate" nor "heretic." I did make lots of arguments, tied to whatever evidence I felt was appropriate to the argument I was making. My points are right there in the article. It seems likely to me that you did not read the article, since your comment does not address a single argument I made.
I do indeed "think and speak for [myself]," and I'm not "enforcing" ideas. I don't have a "campaign" with a goal to "destroy" anyone; this is an allegation you made up. I don't think you truly believe that your opportunity to read my opinion amounts to your being forced to believe what I've said. If my words were inherently coercive, you wouldn't ask me to "please say what you truly mean." If you had arguments in response to my arguments, you'd reply with those counterarguments, rather than simply objecting to my use of the word "transphobic." By ignoring what my article is actually about, and by setting up a straw man about my use of a couple vocabulary words (whose meanings you seem to want to establish and enforce), it seems that if anyone here is playing a "language game," it's you. Your unsubstantiated comment about me appears to be a projection.
Regarding your use of the word "heretic," why yes, I have listened to all seven hours of J.K. Rowling's Witch Trials podcast, and I've written about it in detail (16-min read):
https://tuckerlieberman.medium.com/witch-trials-jk-rowling-2218a05181d0
And here is the evidence of Dawkins's transphobia (11-min read):
https://tuckerlieberman.medium.com/atheist-there-is-no-trans-089527c7ada9
Since you exhort me to "say what [I] truly mean," I'm sure you'll be interested to read my existing work on this topic. Hence, I provided the two articles above, more or less upon your request.
In all my articles, I say what I mean. You aren't positioned to demand that I write more if you aren't interested in reading what I've already written.