The Declaration is online. It's very easy to find, there's no login or required payment to see it, and people may read it if they are curious. I read primary and secondary sources of many kinds, for many reasons, and I encourage others to read too on topics that interest them.

I try to avoid linking directly to websites that, for whatever reason of my own, I don't wish to indirectly amplify in search algorithms. I make this choice when considering the technical features and effects of an online article. It may not primarily imply whether I want anyone to read or not-read something else. I do try to provide enough info about a document so that a thoughtful, attentive person with their own independent motivations can (if they wish) pull it up within 5 seconds, as you evidently have done.

As I see it, the Declaration is transparently anti-transgender in its intent and effect. This is evident to me from reading the Declaration itself as well as from consulting others' analyses of it, such as this analysis by "an academic lawyer working in the field of international human rights with a specialisation in gender and sexuality." https://sandraduffy.wordpress.com/2021/10/26/an-international-human-rights-law-analysis-of-the-whrc-declaration/

The result of reading can be to draw a conclusion. Our conclusions—yours and mine—differ. This doesn't mean one of us hasn't read or is trying to dissuade others from reading the text. It means something else.