Since you've read your source, you are aware you are linking to a single study that examined 191 trans women (the majority of whom had never been convicted of any crime, let alone a violent or sexual crime) during a 40-year period during the late 20th century in Sweden, and that, for whatever reason, among the tiny subset who had ever been convicted of crimes, the higher criminality rates seemed to belong to the older trans women (those "who underwent sex reassignment before 1989," whereas the study continued to 2003 or 2004). Moreover, since in your article you describe "culturally enforced gender expectations" as a form of oppression, I imagine you're inclined to ask: Who tends to be convicted? The study to which you linked was about people convicted of crimes, a group that is of course not necessarily identical with the actual perpetrators of crimes. This study found a handful of trans people convicted of crimes a half-century ago in one country. Whether those crimes and/or convictions occurred before or after their gender transitions, and whether they were perceived as men, women, transgender, or gay at the time—that was all probably relevant in a world where police, judges, and juries see gender, and perhaps someone who has time might like to contemplate whether the study authors even addressed that question. One might also ask how we would know which 20th-century Swedish women were trans and whether Swedish trans women who had not been convicted of any crimes were less visibly trans in whatever social records were consulted and were thus disproportionately ignored by these researchers who were on the lookout for trans women in the social record.

I'd suggest that you do better, but I know you are doing this on purpose.