Member-only story

Why There’s Still An Argument About NYT Coverage of Trans People

The New York Times is digging in its heels on institutional transphobia

Tucker Lieberman
5 min readFeb 25, 2023
wildcat yawning, showing sharp teeth
Wildcat looks cuddly but will bite you — Helmut Stirnweis from Pixabay

Since the February 15 open letter to the New York Times criticizing the newspaper for transphobic articles, there’s been a debate over whether the Times reporting on transgender people amounts to poor “workplace conditions” for Times employees, as that’s something the writers’ union might address. Times journalists organize through the NewsGuild of New York.

It could indeed create bad workplace conditions, particularly for a journalist who is trans or who is closely connected to trans people. One colleague’s words about gender and sexuality inevitably affect their coworkers who belong to those groups.

Though NewsGuild president Susan DeCarava used the words “workplace conditions” in her own letter, she says she intended to take a different angle in her complaint. Following the New York Times letter to staff on February 16 in which editors Joe Kahn and Katie Kingsbury reiterated a “clear policy prohibiting Times journalists from attacking one another’s journalism publicly,” DeCarava reminded them that they’d published Bret Stephens’ opinion “publicly attacking his colleague Nikole Hannah-Jones’s 1619 Project as ‘illogical’ and questioning the veracity of her reporting…

--

--

Tucker Lieberman
Tucker Lieberman

Written by Tucker Lieberman

Cult classic. Author of the novel "Most Famous Short Film of All Time." Editor for Prism & Pen and Identity Current. tuckerlieberman.com

Responses (3)