I don't know if I've written an article devoted to this observation, but I don't think it's an especially bold claim. Those of us who recently began to be insulted as "woke" are aware that we did not sign up for any new dogma in the last four years; there is no "wokeness" membership card. Nor did we (generally speaking) share any existing dogma to which "woke" coherently applies. When someone calls me "woke," they are insulting my gender; rarely do they seriously attempt to spot any particular belief I share with anyone else they're also accusing of being "woke"; and, if 10 people were to try to tell me what they mean when they call me "woke," they might give me 10 different answers.

I do not have time today to write an article substantiating this perception. For one thing, it would be proving a negative — that I don't have whatever ideology I'm being accused of having, or that there is no single ideology to which this word consistently refers. I don't have time to make an infinite list of hypothetical ideologies that aren't mine.

(As context for why I do not have time: I already spent an hour this morning carefully writing a long, fact-based comment, to which the recipient immediately replied by calling me "you people." He may as well have called me "woke.")

I searched for your article on Mounk, and I believe I found the article to which you refer.

https://medium.com/science-meaning/how-identity-politics-sabotaged-the-left-d01be57afe0a

To keep it brief:

In my article to which you replied, what I meant by "ideology" is a set of beliefs that a person consciously embraces — and not (by contrast) a set of beliefs they perceive their opponent to embrace. The latter tend to be straw men and, consequently, tend to become catch-all pejoratives.

To the extent that "wokeness" is defined only by its critics, rather than by its adherents, it's not an ideology. Not according to the working definition I was using (and therefore what I meant) when I wrote that sentence, anyway.