I agree there's no results to be had in re-debunking what's already well debunked. Nevertheless I did (last night) debunk four of Pamela Paul's recent op-eds, and previously I debunked three others of hers. It's not as if anyone on her side will ever read or consider what I say. The "interesting" thing about yesterday's op-ed is that Paul wrote a couple thousand words in which she named a whole bunch of Rowling supporters but didn't bother to name, or otherwise consider the arguments of, a single trans person. She and the newspaper are intentionally excluding us from a "debate" (smear campaign) they are having about (against) us. On the up side, I've found this gives me more freedom to write what I like in my own reaction pieces. I've been very fortunate to somehow stay under their radar. Since I know they won't ever take me seriously, I don't write for them. I write for us.